One car a day, Ford sharp l

In terms of appearance, as the second-in-command of Ford and the second-in-command of the American Department, it is of course necessary to have a domineering appearance. The appearance of this generation is indeed much more domineering than the previous generation and the previous generation. We don’t have the advertising words given by those manufacturers either. In short, I just think it’s very atmospheric and beautiful.

The appearance of this generation is indeed much more domineering than the previous generation and the previous generation. We don’t have the advertising words given by those manufacturers either. In short, I just think it’s very atmospheric and beautiful.

By the way, there is also the hidden door handle. Ford is the first one to make the traditional door handle hidden, and it is applied to the sharp edge L of medium-sized and large SUV, which is a localized and special configuration for cars. Great!

From the perspective of size positioning, although the new Ford Sharp L is still defined as a medium-sized SUV, compared with the old Ford Sharp, the total length of the car body has reached 5 meters, which has been directly extended by 122 mm, and the width of 1961mm has also been significantly widened. The key is that the wheelbase has been extended to 2950mm, no.

Only more spacious than the old sharp edge, compared with the new generation of Toyota Highlander also has a greater advantage.

The power configuration provides pure fuel and hybrid in one step. With the 2.0T turbocharged engine, the power performance has been improved compared with the old Ford Sharp, and the minimum entry door has 252 horsepower. The hybrid version of the internal combustion engine is pulled up to 275 horsepower output, and it is also equipped with a 190 horsepower motor. Therefore, the comprehensive output of the two is quite strong, which can make this big SUV run in 7.1 seconds with zero acceleration.

The configuration in the car is more exaggerated, and it is simply not in the same era as Toyota Highlander. Sharp L is unified with Ford EVOS and the new Mondeo, providing a full-screen configuration directly, with a large screen on the right reaching 27 inches.

There is also a separate digital LCD instrument panel in front of the driver.

Let’s focus on the seat here. The focus is on the second row of seats,

A 200,000-odd traditional joint venture medium and large SUV is equipped with two independent seats, two independent wireless charging, rear-drive independent zone air conditioning and leg rest. Who else is this configuration? Tell me in the comments section.

Who else pays attention to the comfort and convenience of the second row? You said that I don’t need the third row at ordinary times, so I put it away. I use it as a big five and seven for emergency. Doesn’t he smell good?

However, the chassis is obviously degraded, and the large-scale aluminum alloy support kit has disappeared, and the front and rear independent suspension structures are all made of steel. Briefly introduce Ford’s chassis platform. For Ford, small cars are generally B-type platforms, compact cars are C-type platforms, and then medium and large cars are CD4/6 platforms. The previous generation of Sharp, Taurus and Mondeo are all CD4 platforms, while the new Sharp, Evos Fox and Sharp International are all C2 platforms. CD4′ s platform has always been made of good materials. Swing arms and horns are all made of aluminum alloy, which is heavy, quiet and sporty. The C2 platform is all made of steel. The chassis performance limit of CD4 is higher. Therefore, the chassis of Sharp L changes from CD4 to C2, which means the chassis is degraded. But understandably, I gave you the size of the car so much, with a fish screen.

You used it, HUD and other high-tech configurations were arranged for you, and the price was reduced for you. I have to go back and look for it somewhere. Alas, I finally chose the most thankless chassis, which is no problem from the perspective of manufacturers or commodities. In terms of the feeling of the chassis, the maneuverability is indeed reduced, but it is acceptable. Exaggerated, at least 90% of users can’t feel this difference.